TwitterFacebookGoogleRSS

Should the Rockies Trade Carlos Gonzalez?

Dan O’Dowd, GM of the Colorado Rockies, responded to the recent rumors that the team was shopping outfielder Carlos Gonzalez:

“The Carlos Gonzalez thing is a joke,” O’Dowd said. “We’re not trading Carlos Gonzalez.”

Gonzalez is a great player, but is he really worth holding onto?

First off, let’s look at what Gonzalez has done:

Year Age Tm G PA AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI SB CS BB SO BA OBP SLG OPS+ Awards
2008 22 OAK 85 316 302 31 73 22 1 4 26 4 1 13 81 .242 .273 .361 71  
2009 23 COL 89 317 278 53 79 14 7 13 29 16 4 28 70 .284 .353 .525 118  
2010 24 COL 145 636 587 111 197 34 9 34 117 26 8 40 135 .336 .376 .598 143 MVP-3,GG,SS
2011 25 COL 127 542 481 92 142 27 3 26 92 20 5 48 105 .295 .363 .526 126  
2012 26 COL 68 303 276 54 92 18 3 17 54 10 1 25 61 .333 .389 .605 149  
5 Yrs 514 2114 1924 341 583 115 23 94 318 76 19 154 452 .303 .356 .533 126  
162 Game Avg. 162 666 606 107 184 36 7 30 100 24 6 49 142 .303 .356 .533 126  
Provided by Baseball-Reference.com: View Original Table
Generated 6/28/2012.

Those are solid stats on the surface, and they are the second best on the Rockies. 2010 saw Gonzalez take third in the NL MVP voting (behind Joey Votto and Albert Pujols) and earn his first silver slugger and gold glove. He also led the league in hitting, total bases, and total hits. This year, he’s leading the league in runs scored and total bases and is batting close to his 2010 slash line. (For the record, I complained about his splits that year as well)

What happens if you compare the home and away stats?

I Split G PA AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI SB CS BB SO BA OBP SLG TB
  Home 262 1096 994 213 335 65 15 64 208 33 7 84 205 .337 .390 .626 622
  Away 252 1018 930 128 248 50 8 30 110 43 12 70 247 .267 .319 .434 404
Provided by Baseball-Reference.com: View Original Table
Generated 6/28/2012.

As you can see, there is a huge gap between Gonzalez’ home and away stats. Gonzalez murders the ball at home, and becomes closer to an average player on the road. These numbers also include his sub-par rookie season in Oakland in 2008; he had similar lines for home and away that year. It’s also worth noting that the ball park in Oakland is a pitcher’s park.

Money-wise, it’s not impossible. Gonzalez signed an 7-year, $80MM extension with the Rockies prior to the 2011 season; he’s affordable now, but the price continues to rise:

Year Salary
2011 $1,000,000
2012 $5,000,000
2013 $7,500,000
2014 $10,500,000
2015 $16,000,000
2016 $17,000,000
2017 $20,000,000

It’s not a killer deal on its own, but add in the $20MM per season that Troy Tulowitzki is going to make at the end of that contract, and it becomes a little bit of a constraint on the Rockies budget. The Rockies started the season with a payroll a little bit over $81MM; that’s down over the previous 2 seasons. I don’t see the Rockies expanding payroll that much by the end of the contract. We could probably assume it’s up to $90 MM by 2017. That would be almost half of the payroll for 2 players. They would need the relief to be able to compete.

What Type of Package Could They Get?
The Rockies stand to gain a lot by dealing Gonzalez. He’s young (26 this season) and fairly in-expensive at the beginning of the deal. By the time he’s making $20MM, he’s only 31; he’ll be playing for a new contract at that point. That’d be close to the age of Mark Teixeira when the Rangers dealt him (he was actually 27 when dealt). Granted, Teixeira had a year and a half left on his contract at the time and was more of a rental. The Braves traded Neftali Feliz, Elvis Andrus, Matt Harrison, Jarrod Saltalamacchia, and Beau Jones for Teixeira and lefty Ron Mahay. I think the Rockies could get a similar package.

(It’s also worth looking at what the Braves got a year later when they traded Teixeira. When it was clear the Braves were out of it, they moved him to the Angels for Casey Kotchman and Steve Marek. The Angels were less willing to pay a large amount to get a guy that was months from free agency. The Rockies would be much better off trading him sooner rather than later).

Many might say that deal wouldn’t be present in this market. Think about what Oakland and San Diego did this off-season. Oakland landed 10 good prospects for Trevor Cahill and Gio Gonzalez. The Padres landed 3 good prospects and a major league pitcher for Mat Latos.

The Rockies should start by checking with Boston. They’ve been unable to keep a full outfield healthy, don’t hesitate to take on payroll, and haven’t shied away from trading prospects. I’d ask about Matt Barnes as the center piece and hope for a combo of 3 of Garin Cecchini, Anthony Ranaudo, Brandon Jacobs, Jackie Bradley, and Henry Owens. I’d even hope for a lesser player like Jose Iglesias or Brandon Workman to finish out the deal. The only concern would be the big contract that Carl Crawford already has in the outfield.

I’d also check with the Yankees; they have Nick Swisher who’s a free agent after the season and Brett Gardner who’s been hurt most of the season. The Yankees have never worried about adding payroll in the past (but do worry about it now) and have traded a lot of prospects over the year. Any deal would have to begin with Manny Banuelos; if they could get him with either Mason Williams or Tyler Austin, with a couple of Adam Warren, Slade Heathcott, Ravel Santana, and J.R. Murphy, you’d have a solid package.

The third team I would check with would be the Rangers; Gonzalez would be nice insurance for Josh Hamilton leaving. They’d also worry less about a drop off in production, since the Ballpark at Arlington is known to help hitters. Any package would have to start with Martin Perez, and would need to include 2 of Mike Olt, Leonys Martin, and Rougned Odor. I’d also like to less prospects from Jorge Alfaro, Michael Kirkman, Justin Grimm, and Ronald Guzman.

I think other teams could be interested, but those are the 3 that come to mind when talking about adding a player, taking payroll, and having strong farm systems.

Short URL: http://su.pr/1iSqe8

5 comments on “Should the Rockies Trade Carlos Gonzalez?

  1. Why should the Rockies trade CarGo now when he’s cheap AND young? It makes more sense to use him the next two/three seasons and dump him and his increasing salary then. That way if Tulo goes nuclear they have the option of dumping him instead.

    The problem with prospects and a low-end team is that even if you end up getting an ace pitcher out of CarGo you’ll eventually have to pay him too or end up YET AGAIN dumping a hot player due to money. It’s an ugly cycle that has made baseball into a joke. It’s why the NFL holds fans so much better than MLB also.

    • Eugene Tierney on said:

      They would be able to get more for him now when he’s cheap. It’s part of the angle to dealing him now. Like I mentioned in the article, look at the haul that were traded for Latos, Cahill, and Gonzalez; you could even say that since CarGo is a batter, he’s got less risk of injury.

  2. Peter on said:

    The major assumption this article makes is that CarGo would net a Teixeira-type package because he is a Teixeira type player. Unfortunately, that is nonesense…though he is physically gifted, CarGo is a statistical fraud, perhaps the greatest star creation in the history of Coors field.

    Forget the potential power contributions of the thin air…the biggest benefit CarGo receives from his home ballpark is in plate discipline. He is a horrible, horrible OBP player…even in 2008 when he played for Oakland, his stats showed this (his home OBP was 19 points worse than his away OBP, as you would expect from a pitcher’s park).

    CarGo is considered by many to be a sure top-20 MLB player, and I laugh at that notion. Given how expensive he will soon become, I’m not sure I’d take him (and his contract) for free, much less for a sizeable prospect haul.

    I won’t speak for every team, but given the way the Red Sox and Yankees value OBP, I don’t see them overlooking CarGo’s major inadequacy there.

    • Eugene Tierney on said:

      I don’t consider Gonzalez one of the better players in baseball for the splits. I think he’s a solid player. Not every team uses OBP as an indicator of a players worth, nor should they use that as the sole indicator on players. I’ve seen head scratchers before (Kazmir for Victor Zambrano is an obvious one), so I wouldn’t rule out a Teixeira-like return for a player like CarGo. It might not be the smartest move, but I questioned Oakland and St. Louis for trading for Matt Holliday.

  3. KIKIN on said:

    well Rockies are in line for a new tv deal after next season, so they will have room to keep those 2 players, besides have a lot of good young players under team control, also I am sure that even young pitchers have suck this season Rox have a real good chance of making a good rotation out of Chacin, Nicasio, Chatwood, Pomeranz, White, Cabrera Matzek, Anderson and down the road Aquino, AND with hopefully next year wont be as dry and Coors field will play a little less hitter friendly as it has played the past five years

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

94,827 Spam Comments Blocked so far by Spam Free Wordpress

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

CyberChimps